The differences I did notice are as follows:
- Bloglines has a bit of a "cleaner" interface.
- Google Reader has links to all your other Google services which makes for a more cluttered screen
- Blogger posts appear in one's Google Reader faster than in his or her Bloglines reader. (I just noticed this difference today, Sunday, 9/28, with Steve's latest announcement...it's already showing in Google Reader but has yet to be picked up by Bloglines.)
- Google Reader puts a date/time stamp at the top rt corner of each entry (and does the math for you, letting you know how long ago a post was written) while Bloglines dates each post under the entry. GR's method highlights newer posts.
- Bloglines allows readers either to display all posts from each feed or to show only those posted in the last hour, past 6 hours, past 12 hours, day, 2 or 3 days, week or month. This is convenient if one only wants to see the latest entries.
2 comments:
I also couldn't find an option for seeing comments. I'm glad somebody else out there likes BlogLines
I would agree that these services are superficially the same and that ease of use and familiarity are what is important. For that reason...Google wins, eh? Digging deeper they are different, but WHY dig deeper if there is a service that you trust and can use?
Post a Comment