boyd on board

I really enjoyed reading Danah Boyd's account of the history of social networking sites. Reading about the rise (and, in some cases, fall) of different sites reminds us that, as with most social software applications, social networking sites are just a means to an end (and not an end in and of themselves.) A library can't set up a myspace or facebook account and then pat him/herself on the back and think, "There. I am now on the cutting edge of technology and am where my users are so we can connect online." Boyd's articles clearly show that all these applications will continue to evolve and that we need to keep abreast of the changes.

I also found her explanation about how the different sites appeal to different "class divisions" a bit troubling, but can clearly see the points she makes. (I also respect how she repeatedly admitted to being uncomfortable even broaching the topic.) Just as libraries have different collections and items that appeal to different users, it's essential that we are aware of the differences in social networking sites and can understand how each may appeal to different groups of people for different reasons.